(joke, no offense to Finns!)
1. Name all of them from left to right.
2. Which manufacturer did each one drive for at time of photo ?
BONUS:
On which rally was this photo taken ?
Thursday, August 28, 2014
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Explanation request answered
I got asked from a reader to explain this: "°". I mean degrees as in angle degrees.
As far as I can tell Loeb's corners follow this logic:
He also has slower corners like hairpins, etc. but I omitted all that to keep it simple.
In practical terms this is how it applies:
As far as I can tell Loeb's corners follow this logic:
He also has slower corners like hairpins, etc. but I omitted all that to keep it simple.
In practical terms this is how it applies:
![]() |
From top to bottom: left 130 short onto right 130 half-long left 144 tightens 130 short. green color is racing line. |
If you assume this is a blind corner, the "left 144 tightens 130 short" example shows a very basic example of how handy his notes are. He knows the severity of the entry corner, how much space he has to brake, the severity of the tighter corner and its exact racing line.
A pace note side note
Hi
everyone,
It’s been a
long time since my last post and it’s great to have some motivation to write a
bit more on this blog ! I hope you will enjoy it.
There has
been some interesting discussions on this forum from time to time: http://www.motorsportforums.com/forumdisplay.php?14-WRC-World-Rally-Championship
Today I’d like to
focus on this thread:
Where I
asked:
It's a shame that
Mads (Ostberg) isn't able to go faster than what he is currently showing.
It seems to me that
he has the gift of driving, and the adequate balls, not even mentioning the
experience...and car.
I have a feeling
that his pace notes are not precise enough. I am just looking at his driving
and cannot understand his Norwegian notes so not sure...but that's what it
looks like to my eye anyway.
I mean by that:
1. the excessive
sideways driving
2. the lack of
commitment on specific fast entry corners into dead slow ones (when it's blind
only).
In my view these
are signs of a good driver who is unsure about EXACTLY what the upcoming
corners are like and/or the distances between them (exact racing lines and
braking points).
Maybe a bit of
coaching would do him good.
That's my two cents.
Any ideas?
What I’d
like to do is go over Sebastien Loeb’s pace notes system and share what all
that gibberish means in terms of driving (as far as I can understand). For this example we’ll use the first
few km of stage 14 from ADAC Rallye Deutschland 2011. This stage is located in
the Baumholder military area. There are lots of surface changes, junctions,
rough sections, high speed sections, hinkelsteins, etc.
You can
find the in-car here: http://youtu.be/kI-9lIEa4YA
START
Droite a fond long et long ciel tout droit
Flat right long (apex far into corner) and long crest keep straight
250 metres gauche 140 moins mi-long pas corde entrée
léger gravette sortie
250 m left 140° half-long (apex a bit around the corner) don’t cut at the corner entry and there is light gravel at exit
100 metres attention à la flèche droite 156 ferme 100
mi-long
100 m caution at the sign post (turn arrow) right 150° over 60 m (this means the corner runs for 60 m) tightens to 100° half long
et gauche a fond long
And flat left long
sur droite a fond 100 metres
Onto flat right 100 m
droite 140 plus long fond
Right 140° plus long flat (flat out corner)
et gauche ferme 140 bon long pas corde
And left tightens to 140° ok (good corner although it may look weird from driver’s perspective, this is to prevent him from lifting off) long don’t cut
et droite 140 bon long
And right 140° ok long
et gauche 140 mi-court corde frein pour 60 metres face
fleche gauche 100 corde max
And left 140° half-long cut braking over 60m until in front of sign (arrow) left 100° maximum cut
et droite 60 long pas corde
And right 60° don’t cut
sur gauche 80 moins rasé glisse
Onto left 80° minus go very close to inside (there is a rock) slippery
sur droite a fond long tard frein pour gauche 100 mi long
50 metres apres fleche
Onto flat right long late braking for left 100° half long 50 m after sign
et gauche a fond
And flat left
et droite 90 plus tard elargis
And right 90° plus late apex let the car go wide (this means the road is unusually wide and he should use it)
sur gauche ferme 140 moins long
Onto left tightens 140° minus long
sur ciel et attention a la fleche bleue droite 145 bon ferme
130 bon
Onto crest and caution at the blue sign right 140° over 50m then tightens to 130° ok
130 metres gauche 110 mi-long début dalle
130 m left 110° half-long start of concrete slabs (this is useful to know because it's more slippery smooth concrete)
200 metres attention droite 149 bon frein pour gauche 90
mi-long derriere paille
200 m caution right 140° over 90 m ok braking for left 90° half long behind hay bale.
sur droite a fond long
Onto flat right
et attention gauche 110 tres long tard corde legere
And caution left 110° very long until apex small cut
et droite a fond sur gauche 130 plus plus mi-long corde fond
ouvre
And flat right onto left 130° plus plus half-long cut then opens flat (flat ou corner)
et droite a fond corde legere sur attention 70 metres
gauche 130 moins long tard rail sortie
And flat right small cut over caution 70 m left 130° minus long late (late apex) narrow clean line for wheels only at exit (rail sortie) (this means stay in the clean tracks)
sur droite a fond pas corde sur gauche a fond et
attention droite 154 ferme 130 mi-long béton
Onto flat right don’t cut onto flat left and caution right 150° over 40 m tightens to 130° half-long concrete (change to better grip level)
et attention gauche 124 moins frein corde ok pour droite
80
And caution left 120° over 40 m braking cut ok for right 80°
250 metres …
250 m …
There is a lot of detail and sometimes his co-driver has little time to say it all. It gets even worse in twisty mountain roads. Loeb focuses on describing what the shape of the corners are like. You may think this is elementary!
Oh, but
it is not!
Many do it the other way and rely mainly on speed indications
with some description of road conditions and apex location through words like short, half-long, long, very long, etc. Petter Solberg's notes are a good example of speed notes with notes like "5 right minus half-long", 5 being the gear and minus meaning it's a bit lower in rpm's, half-long meaning the apex is a bit around the corner. I know you're gonna say it's pretty straight forward and you don't need me to tell you all of that. Well, you are right and that's exactly my point! In speed note cases it is often straight forward.
Loeb’s
system is primarily descriptive, with sometimes some speed notes. By speed
notes I mean “plus” and “minus”, “flat” additions, “brake points”, etc. When
necessary he will also give some notes about where to position his car on the
road. In this case we are talking about where to be on a blind crest, letting
the car run wide on a corner exit, how much to cut, etc. Others do the same to a certain extent but he puts more effort into describing very precisely the corner combinations, how long corners are in terms of meters and where he should brake! This is paramount information in blind corners. Many top drivers simply don't do that.
You will hear things like "very long 6 Left tightens into 2". Unless the driver has intimate knowledge of the stage this information is simply not enough to be "balls out" in a reliable way.
You will hear things like "very long 6 Left tightens into 2". Unless the driver has intimate knowledge of the stage this information is simply not enough to be "balls out" in a reliable way.
You will notice on the in-car footage that a "flat" corner (a fond) for Loeb is only used for corners which have almost zero angle to them (they happen to be flat out, mostly, yes). My point is if he comes out of a dead slow hairpin and into a 90° left he will call that corner a 90 left and not a flat left, even though it's on full acceleration.
For a driver the advantages behind the descriptive system are the following:
1. after getting used to it your brain will automatically understand exactly what is coming up and you will instinctively adjust the speed, even though there are few speed indications.
2. the descriptive system is independent of weather or road conditions.
3. almost completely independant of your car's performance level.
4. very useful in reduced visibility.
Point n° 1 is a question of work, patience, dedication and understanding but n° 2 & 4 are the real biggies and when rallies have new stages and/or are fought in changing conditions these will really pay off.
I believe that his note system was pivotal in his success. It permitted him to use his skill to the fullest whilst being able to keep the risk taking to a minimum and hence his very limited amount of accidents. It also enabled him to set-up his cars for precision driving and he could focus solely on achieving maximum traction and speed out of corners.
This guy's driving was in my opinion a dream come true for his engineers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)